History of Law enforcement in the United States

By 1870, almost both major American city had a full-time natural law force in place (Doerner, 12). The reason behind this refinement of the law of nature forces was the need to provide the security and peace-of-mind required by the average citizen. As urban areas grew and immigrants poured into the country from far and wide, it was requisite to institute some form of social control to manipulate that individually citizen's rights were maintained (14). The roots of the forces legal philosophy are somewhat disparate. In order to combat desertion in the Revolutionary Army, George Washington created the office of the Provost in 1776 to police the Army's recruits. In 1778, the Provost corps was offici onlyy established, with a mission to "apprehend and preventive all marauders, rioters, drunkards and deserters, and all soldiers who would be found beyond the limits of their organizations without allowance" (azstarnet.com). In 1917, with the United States entering World War I, command Pershing expanded the traditional Provost's office into the Military Police as we know it today.

Although the soldiery and civil police began with very different mandates, the overall inclination of both organizations was to keep the peace. Today, the distinction amidst armed forces and civilian police goals is not as stark. The goal of civilian police departments around the country is "to protect the rights of all people, ensure order, and provide for the public's safety" by delivering highly overlord law enforcement

Doerner, W. G., (1998). Introduction to law Enforcement: An Insider's View, Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

http://www.wood.army.mil/usamps/14thMPBde/795thMPBn/795OSUTphases.htm

In recent years the military and civilian police have increasingly begun to resemble each other. Domestically, the climax of the war on doses and the rise in terrorism has led to the militarization of the civilian police. The military trains and equips immigration and drug officers, assists in the building of the wall between Mexico and the U.S., and patrols the border. Likewise, internationally the advent of United Nations Peacekeeping missions has expanded the role of the military police to include patrolling civilians abroad (Kiser, 32).

Other similarities include the military and civilian police's role in their overall judicial systems. The Military police report, in the end, to the Judge Advocate General's office (JAG). JAG decides who to prosecute, carry the trial to the Military court (azstarnet.com). Likewise, the civilian police in the end report to the District Attorney's office. The DA then decides whether or not to prosecute the offender in court (Germann, 132). Thus, virtuoso can see that the civilian and military police enthrall many organizational similarities.

Kiser, George C., (1997) "Military policing of the United States (Human Rights Watch)", Vol. 57, The Humanist, 05-15-1997, pp 32(2).

services (Doerner, 262). The military police have a slightly different focus. Their " specific and sole duty" extends to "preserving property and arresting 'all wrong-doers, of whatever regiment or corps they may be'" (azstarnet.com). Implicit in the military police mission of statement is the idea that their actions are meant to fancy the proper working of the military apparatus, including policing convoys as well as camps. In this sense, however, they are similar to the civilian police corps both are organized to ensure that their constituent's societies perfo
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.