Deanna Earle MGMT 1125 George Erwin September 6, 2012 Case Study 5: The HP Pretexting engagement 1. What atomic number 18 the ethical smothers in this moorage? In this casing their wee a ethical issues that had to do with the corporation and the individuals adopts with it. check out identity card member were untrusting and as well use work phones and emails to let out information to the public. George Keyworth was not a ethical person because he leaked confidential information and also let a probe be opened, instead of macrocosm honest. CEO Dunn showed an ethical lieu and was forced to resign by board members, which describes the other board members to be unethical also. 2. Who are the stakeholders impacted by this line? How would you rank their claims? Everyone related to this caller-up is affected by this situation. Investigators and employees didnt want to observe involves because they didnt want to investigate their induce boss es or be involve in conflicts of interest. I envisage their claims were reasonable but begettert calculate deed should be taken upon them.
just to prevent this issue there should be a policy or clause addressing this issue with its consequences so it doesnt proceed again. 3. Was the investigation into the recurring countersign leaks ethical? Why or Why not? What action would you recommend that a society in a similar situation take? I dont think this was ethical. I dont think information discussed in a board should be discussed or brought to the media unless they are doing something illegal. Without candor and trust these board members will also have these issue s. I think policies and consequences shoul! d handle situations wish well this. Someone should not be able to show dishonesty, drop of respect or unethical decisions and still be a part of that company.If you want to get a full essay, put up it on our website:
OrderEssay.netIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page:
write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment