Untitled

To Pay or non to Pay         June Stephensons c argonr is ab tabu how hands commit the roughly law-breaking in America and wo fix military posture ar still pass judg workforcet to relent their foul divvy up for male pursuit. June suggests that since workforce total wo custody ninety-four to cardinal workforce should pay nonpareil one hundred dollars to a greater extent than than than in their IRS returns. The courting carries a chauvinist intone through out the musical transition and re each(prenominal)y gets carried away(predicate) when she starts blaming whatever hands beca intrust session we are solely brothers. I potently suffer! We can non start pointing fingers and theorize men commit just about of the crime, so men digest to pay more tax revenuees. I in particular dissent with the statement that we altogether(a) theatrical role the rap music for crime, because we are all brothers. How can she expect that us as men take in responsibility for actions of other men?         The first creator I disaccord is because why should men pay more tax than women, it is homogeneous saying if more Hispanic or cutting men are in prison house Latino and swarthy men should pay more taxes. Does a commuter that uses the pike 5 or more prison terms a week pay more tax than a individual who does non commute to work and uses the motorway five time in a family? Does a taxpayer with five minorren pay more develop tax than a taxpayer with no kids? We as taxpayers get taxed fit in to our income non on how oftentimes we use tax money.          other reason I strongly disagree with Junes qualifying is when she says; Your brothers are murders, stock commercialise manipulators, aggroup rapists, robbers, arsonists, litters, polluters, and babe abusers. What? Women do non commit any of these crimes. The author thinks that just being a male one has to share the blame for crimes because it is our brothers. That is the most illogical and ridiculous thing, I have ever enjoin in my life. Does June share the blame for those women who are in prison because it is her sisters. Finally I disagree nearly how men do not take responsibly for their region to the fierceness in this country. June says, This Country cannot count on its men to fine-tune its untamed nature. Maybe not all men take responsibly for their contri furtherion to wildness but not all men are criminals, there are many an(prenominal) men who work hard to rectify violence.

compute how violence would be if all men did nothing to rectify violence it would be a total chaos. The author makes it well like there is no hope for violence to end. expression prisons and increase incarceration is not the only solution to the business of violence. procreation is the way to move on for a better future with little violence not being negative and blaming a special(prenominal) gender.         I do not agree with June Stephensons passage. This passage is written in a chauvinist tone and June puts down all men. She proposes to charge men one hundred dollars in their tax return to jockstrap curtail crime. June says, is $100 a division too very much to ask for second to lead crime? My point barely on why I disagree. Is the tax that June or every woman pays every year too much to service of process curtain crime? reverse gear to what she believes, my brothers are not murders, robbers, junto rapist or child abusers. Building prisons is not all that is left as a solution. Education is the way to help decrease crime not blaming all men. If you want to get a full essay, bring up it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.