Fostering Attention on Effective Toxic Waste Management

When this figure is comp atomic number 18d with the size of the tribe of the United States, it can be seen that more than two and three-quarters scores of cyanogenic waste is released "for every single person in the country each and every year."

Toxic waste is for the most part caused by industries which use perilous materials in their manufacturing processes. The dangers to the environment and to forgiving health usually occur when the wastes ar disposed of. If such wastes are burned, the smoke contributes to air topution and to the depletion of the ozone layer. If the wastes are dumped into a river or ocean, the result is an increase in water pollution. If the wastes are buried, they pose a flagellum in ground of groundwater contamination. veritable(a) if the wastes are sealed in containers before being buried, in that respect are various circumstances which can cause the containers to leak. When they leak, the virulent wastes are absorbed into the ground and thereby make their focal point into nearby groundwater reservoirs. Even if the wastes are disposed of in designated landfills, they crap the capacity for contaminating the groundwater which people depend upon for drinking purposes. Furthermore, the problems of deadly waste disposal are compounded by the devote of illegal dumping. Illegal dumping poses a greater threat to environment and health than other methods of disposal, because illegal sites may " roost unknown to authorities for years." By the ti

"EPA Targets 17 Toxics." Science News 139 (16 February 1991): 101.

Zipko, Stephen J. Toxic Threat: How tempestuous Substances Poison Our Lives. New York: Julian Messner, 1986.

In debates over the toxic waste issue, two predominant points of view emerge. Essentially, these views are ground on the contrast which exists between hole-and-corner(a) and earth interests. The private interest, which is represented by the companies handling hazardous materials, is focused on the fact that something needs to be done with the waste. In seek a way for disposing of this waste, these companies also express a absolute interest in terms of not spending as well much money.

The public, on the other hand, is generally concerned with rescue the environment and with protecting human health. The public interest holds that no amount of money is too large if it saves lives and restores the environment. The concerns of the American public were made clear in a 1990 Roper poll in which the respondents ranked active hazardous waste sites as the number one environmental problem and abandoned hazardous waste sites as the second largest environmental problem.

me the illegal sites are uncovered, chemical leakages may have already done irreparable damage.

Despite the problems with the Superfund law, there is hope for the future in terms of dealing with the toxic waste problem. In the fall of 1990, EPA leader William K. Reilly announced that the agency would make a new mulish effort to handle the issue. In an effort to make it financially easier for industries to cooperate in cleanup efforts, the EPA declared that it would "systematically propose low-cost strategies for solving the nation's worst unresolved pollution problems." In addition, the EPA's new approach calls for giving industries an alternative for avoiding the Superfund and other forms of politics regulation. Thus, if companies voluntarily cut their output of toxic waste by one-third, the EPA will have no reason t
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.