Final Exam

OFFICE MEMORANDUM OF LAW

To: Michael Heindl, Attorney
From: Jane Doe
Date: May 7, 2009
Case: wild Dog refreshen v. Jonesville City Council
Office File no: HCC-05-2009
Docket No: HCC-2008-2009
Re: First Amendment; Freedom of Expression

assertion of Assignment

You retain asked me to prepare a legal office history on the question of whether our client Mad Dog Review’s First Amendment Freedom of Expression recompenses were violated when they were violated when they were banned from playing in the metropolis of Jonesville.

display board of Contents
Page
I. disclose2
II. Brief Answer2
III. argument of Facts3
IV. Analysis3-4
V. Conclusion4-5

Table of Authorities
Page
CASES
Atlantic Beach Casino v. Morenzoni 2,3,4
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
U. S. Const. amend. I2,3.4
STATUTES
municipal principle section 355-202,3,4

Issue


According to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, has the hip-hop band Mad Dog Review rights to freedom of style been violated by the Jonesville City Council by banning the from performing in their community under section 355-20 of the Municipal regularization?

Brief Answer


Yes. It is a violation of the band’s right to freedom of expression.



According to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, all individuals have the right to express themselves without interference or restraint from the government.

Statement of Facts


Mad Dog Review is a local bump band. The lyrics to one of their songs, “Mad Dog City Council” allegedly describes their city council in explicit terms, using “dirty” words and style generally considered obscene. Based upon the language in their song, and specifically that in “Mad Dog City Council”, the city of Jonesville has banned the mathematical group from performing in their community based the enacted Municipal Ordinance section 355-20.

Analysis


According to the...If you want to get a effective essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .